Mortgage & Property Advice Centre for First Time Home Buyers

First time buyers 'don't need a deposit to get a good deal'

24-Jul-2006

First time buyers can secure competitive mortgage deals without saving for years to put down a deposit, mortgage adviser John Charcol states.

Although aspiring homeowners with higher deposits have access to a wider range of deals, the mortgage adviser questions whether first time buyers should delay getting onto the first rung of the property ladder.

Ray Boulger, senior technical director at John Charcol, maintained that there are good deals around for first time buyers without deposits, especially professionals and graduates.

He noted: "One of the questions people should ask themselves is should I be saving for a deposit then not be able to buy a house for X number of years?

"Or should I perhaps save a smaller deposit and be able to buy a house a bit quicker?

"Or should I not save a deposit at all and get a 100 per cent mortgage today?"

A recent report from Alliance & Leicester found that first time buyers face a shortfall of £5,000 in the deposit they are aiming to save, despite putting money aside for two years.

Article Options:

Email this article to a friend

Get updates from our RSS Feed

Post this article to:

del.icio.us

Digg

Reddit

2008: May | Apr | Mar | Feb | Jan

2007: Dec | Nov | Oct | Sep | Aug | Jul | Jun | May | Apr | Mar | Feb | Jan

2006: Dec | Nov | Oct | Sep | Aug | Jul | Jun | May | Apr | Mar | Feb | Jan

2005: Dec | Nov | Oct | Sep | Aug | Jul | Jun | May | Apr | Mar

Newsletter

Free First Time Buyer Newsletter

Register

20 second poll - How optimistic are you?

Are properties in your area more expensive than they were a year ago?

Yes
No

Are you keener to buy a property now than you were this time a year ago?

Yes
No

Are the finance options for FTBs better now than they were a year ago?

Yes
No

Would it be better to wait until this time next year?

Yes
No

Would you ideally like to be able to buy your first home now?

Yes
No